![]() ![]() They need to go back to business school, first you determine your cost, then you price your product. They are the ones who refuse to pay for the content that the monetize at a reasonable price point. It’s the streaming services’ that have priced their product too low and have forced the creative community to accept the pitifully low payment share by leveraging against the free downloads available from pirates. However, the drastic reduction in revenues from streaming verses the physical product market is the real culprit, not the greed of the major labels. Yes, the big labels have lousy terms in their older agreements, which did not anticipate streaming at all. The reason Artists make so little is that the per play payout is too low. The entrepreneur and executive may have capitalized on the considerable (since lost) value by selling his interest. It’s unclear whether the window between Jehan’s departure from Spotify and the Globes interview has anything to do with SPOT shares’ touching $291.75 apiece eight days back. ![]() That suggested that top-ranked artists can earn a sustainable living, though ‘hundreds’ is statistically insignificant when measured against the millions of artists currently on Spotify. Separately, Kobalt Music subsidiary AWAL made waves after claiming that “hundreds” of its artists earn over $100,000 per year from streaming, in addition to stating that streaming puts $1 million or more into the pockets of “dozens” of its artists annually. First, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek told musicians to release more music if they wish to enhance their streaming royalties musicians promptly responded with advice of their own. Just last month, two developments pushed the issue back into the spotlight. ![]() The low per-stream royalties of Spotify (and other streaming services) have long been a source of controversy and debate in the music community. Update: the piece is now live again (thanks Music Ally for the tip). However, Music Ally accessed (and used Google to translate) the article before it was removed. Globes hasn’t addressed the sudden takedown, and at the time of this writing, the piece didn’t appear to be available elsewhere on the web. Suspiciously, the interview has since been pulled from both Globes’ Hebrew-language site and its English-language counterpart. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |